Friday, 12 June 2020


MY BLOG 10        MYTHOLOGY
THE LEGEND OF PRAHLADA
The story of the wise and magnanimous Prahláda, whose adventures are ever interesting and instructive is very simple mythological tale reminiscent of the conflicts and wars between various sections of the Aryan tribes in the remotest period of time.
In every age we have daityas and gods  envious of each other.In some cases we find from the old tales that there are no ethnic, racial or outward features to qualify one party as gods and the other as one of daityas. Sometimes they happen to be relatives even.They can be likened to the members of two rival political parties fighting for power.

As the story goes ; Hiranyakashipu was the king of the Daityas . His name in Sanskrit means "one who is  clothed in gold”; and depicts one who is very much fond of wealth . He was married to Leelavathi, a noble wife.   

He was very  arrogant, exceedingly cruel, and materialistic by nature and seized the throne of the gods and ruled for sometime . His brother, Hiranyaksha another daitya who had been a nuisance and spreading venom, was killed by  Lord Varaha, an incarnation of Lord Vishnu in an earlier epoch. 
Somehow he acquired special powers through meditation and by propitiating the deities.   He was granted a boon that he could neither be killed during the day nor night, inside or outside, by any weapon nor by any man or animal. The boon,in fact, according to the Váyu Puráńa, was, that he should not be slain by any created being:
Endowed with these special powers,Hiranyakashipu declared himself to be the master of the whole universe and proclaimed that there was no other God but himself, and strictly enjoined that the Omnipotent Vishnu should have no worship offered to Him anywhere; and that all the worship should henceforth be offered to himself only.
Hiranyakashipu had a son called Prahlâda. Now, it so happened, that this Prahlada from his infancy was devoted to God. He showed indications of this as a child; and the king of the Daityas, fearing that the evil he wanted to drive away from the world would crop up in his own family, made over his son to two teachers called Shanda and Amarka, who were very stern disciplinarians, with strict injunctions that Prahlada was never to hear even the name of Vishnu mentioned. The teachers took the prince to their home, and there he was put to study with the other children of his age. But the little Prahlada, instead of learning from his books, devoted all the time in teaching the other boys how to worship Vishnu. When the teachers found it out, they were frightened, for the fear of the mighty king Hiranyakashipu was upon them, and they tried their best to dissuade the child from such teachings. But Prahlada could no more stop his teaching and worshipping Vishnu than he could stop breathing. To clear themselves, the teachers told the terrible fact to the king, that his son was not only worshipping Vishnu himself, but also spoiling all the other children by teaching them to worship Vishnu.
The monarch became very much enraged when he heard this and called the boy to his presence. He tried by gentle persuasions to dissuade Prahlada from the worship of Vishnu and taught him that he, the king, was the only God to worship. But it was to no purpose. The child declared, again and again, that the Omnipresent Vishnu, Lord of the universe, was the only Being to be worshipped — for even he, the king, held his throne only so long as it pleased Vishnu. The rage of the king knew no bounds, and he ordered the boy to be immediately killed. So the Daityas struck him with pointed weapons; but Prahlad's mind was so intent upon Vishnu that he felt no pain from them.
When his father, the king, saw that it was so, he became frightened but, roused to the worst passions of a Daitya, contrived various diabolical means to kill the boy. He ordered him to be trampled under foot by an elephant. The enraged elephant could not crush the body any more than he could have crushed a block of iron. So this measure also was to no purpose. Then the king ordered the boy to be thrown over a precipice, and this order too was duly carried out; but, as Vishnu resided in the heart of Prahlada, he came down upon the earth as gently as a flower drops upon the grass. Poison, fire, starvation, throwing into a well, enchantments, and other measures were then tried on the child one after another, but to no purpose. Nothing could hurt him in whose heart dwelt Vishnu.
At last, the king ordered the boy to be tied with mighty serpents called up from the nether worlds, and then cast to the bottom of the ocean, where huge mountains were to be piled high upon him, so that in course of time, if not immediately, he might die; and he ordered him to be left in this plight. Even though treated in this manner, the boy continued to pray to his beloved Vishnu: "Salutation to Thee, Lord of the universe. Thou beautiful Vishnu!" Thus thinking and meditating on Vishnu, he began to feel that Vishnu was near him, nay, that He was in his own soul, until he began to feel that he was Vishnu, and that he was everything and everywhere.
As soon as he realised this, all the snake bonds snapped asunder; the mountains were pulverised, the ocean upheaved, and he was gently lifted up above the waves, and safely carried to the shore. As Prahlada stood there, he forgot that he was a Daitya and had a mortal body: he felt he was the universe and all the powers of the universe emanated from him; there was nothing in nature that could injure him; he himself was the ruler of nature. Time passed thus, in one unbroken ecstasy of bliss, until gradually Prahlada began to remember that he had a body and that he was Prahlada. As soon as he became once more conscious of the body, he saw that God was within and without; and everything appeared to him as Vishnu.
When the king Hiranyakashipu found to his horror that all mortal means of getting rid of the boy who was perfectly devoted to his enemy, the God Vishnu, were powerless, he was at a loss to know what to do. The king had the boy again brought before him, and tried to persuade him once more to listen to his advice, through gentle means. But Prahlada made the same reply. Thinking, however, that these childish whims of the boy would be rectified with age and further training, he put him again under the charge of the teachers, Shanda and Amarka, asking them to teach him the duties of the king. But those teachings did not appeal to Prahlada, and he spent his time in instructing his schoolmates in the path of devotion to the Lord Vishnu.
When his father came to hear about it, he again became furious with rage, and calling the boy to him, threatened to kill him, and abused Vishnu in the worst language. But Prahlada still insisted that Vishnu was the Lord of the universe, the Beginningless, the Endless, the Omnipotent and the Omnipresent, and as such, he alone was to be worshipped.
Narasimha was the man-lion form of Lord Vishnu. He killed Hiranyakashipu at the twilit (neither day nor night); on the doorsteps of his palace (which is neither inside nor outside of the home); puts him on his lap (neither on earth nor in space); and used his nails for killing (neither animate nor inanimate).
The king roared with anger and said: "Thou evil one, if thy Vishnu is God omnipresent, why doth he not reside in that pillar yonder?" Prahlada humbly submitted that He did do so. "If so," cried the king, "let him defend thee; I will kill thee with this sword." Thus saying the king rushed at him with sword in hand, and dealt a terrible blow at the pillar. Instantly thundering voice was heard, and lo and behold, there issued forth from the pillar Vishnu in His awful  man-lion form . He killed Hiranyakashipu at the twilit (neither day nor night); on the doorsteps of his palace (which is neither inside nor outside of the home); puts him on his lap (neither on earth nor in space); and used his nails for killing (neither animate nor inanimate).Panic-stricken, the Daityas ran away in all directions.
God is Omnipresent in whatever form he seems to appear,when,where and why; only He knows!
Then the gods descended from heaven and offered prayers to Vishnu, and Prahlada also fell at His feet and broke forth into exquisite hymns of praise and devotion. And he heard the Voice of God saying, "Ask, Prahlada ask for anything thou desires"; thou art My favourite child; therefore ask for anything thou mayest wish." And Prahlada choked with feelings replied, "Lord, I have seen Thee. What else can I want? Do thou not tempt me with earthly or heavenly boons." Again the Voice said: "Yet ask something, my son." And then Prahlada replied, "That intense love, O Lord, which the ignorant bear to worldly things, may I have the same love for Thee; may I have the same intensity of love for Thee, but only for love's sake!"
Then the Lord said, "Prahlada, though My intense devotees never desire for anything, here or hereafter, yet by My command, do thou enjoy the blessings of this world to the end of the present cycle, and perform works of religious merit, with thy heart fixed on Me. And thus in time, after the dissolution of thy body, thou shalt attain Me." Thus blessing Prahlada, the Lord Vishnu disappeared. Then the gods headed by Brahma installed Prahlada on the throne of the Daityas and returned to their respective spheres.
 According to the Hindu scriptures, Lord Narasimha is described as a fierce avatar of the Hindu God Lord Vishnu who incarnated in the form of part lion and part Man for destroying evil forces and ending calamity on Earth, thereby restoring the rule of Dharma and righteousness. (adapted from Vishnu Purana.tr. Wilson, Bk I,ch.16-20)
Historical context
It seems probable that in the  very early stages of Aryan settlements when the Society was primitive, there were rivalries and conflicts between Devas and Daityas for grabing vast tracts of land for their tribes. Thus they were constantly at war and the superior party won in the end. In this case it culminated in the elimination of  Hiranyakashipu and his son was enthroned after him suggesting an amicable settlement between the two rival groups.
It may have been an historic event too as the capital of the kingdom of Hiranyakashipu was Multan (now in Pakistan)on the east bank of river Chenab as attested by ancient traditions.  It is said that  Multan was  earlier known as Kashyap-Pur having been founded  by Raja Kashyap. It was named Prahiladpuri when Prahlada became the king. Later it transformed to moolsthan and then to Multan.
Persian Kings had built a temple of Sun God in which the idol in pure gold was installed. During Muslim onslaughts, Muhammad bin Qasim in his raids found 330 chests of treasure containing 13300 maunds ( 532 metric tones) gold. Entire treasure was shifted from Multan to Basra on ships. After Islamic conquest, Arab rulers got handsome income from temple of the Sun. Whenever any Hindu Raja intended to conquer Multan the Arab rulers would threaten to destroy the temple. 
 According to Buzrag bin Shahryar  this temple  was known as a monument to God  Aaditya (Surya). Al Biruni ( 973-1048 A.D.) paid a visit to this temple as  mentioned  by him in his memoirs. ( source ;Multan gazetteer)
By : O P Gupta

LEGEND OF DHRUVA



9                 BLOG        MYTHOLOGY
THE LEGEND OF DHRUVA

In Indian mythology,the polestar is called Dhruva and we have an interesting legend of a little prince behind it.
The story of Dhruva is a very simple and popular one which can be found even in the curriculum of the primary schools and very widely known to every Hindu household .
This story is symbolic of the birth of Polestar at the dawn of Time when the Lord of the Universe was designing the placement of planets and stars in the vast space as per the schedule mandated by the Creator.
 Lord Manu had two righteous and brave sons known as Priyavrata and Uttánapáda. The mention of the very word Uttánapáda arouses our curiousity to search for the hidden meaning in the story
Uttánapáda  had two wives – the elder one, Suniti and the younger one Suruchi. When Suniti gave birth to a baby boy, after many years of their marriage, King was elated. He proudly named him Dhruva. King Uttánapáda distributed gifts and the entire kingdom rejoiced. There was no end to everybody’s happiness that a little prince and heir to the kingdom was born.  The king also had another son Uttama, born to his second queen Suruchi, who was the King’s favourite wife.

Uttánapáda  himself was very fond of his younger wife Suruchi than of Suniti and liked Uttama much more than he liked Dhruva. Suruchi was envious of all the attention king’s first wife and her son Dhruva got. She resented them both.

 Once  when Dhruva was just five years old he found that Uttama was sitting in his father’s lap on the throne. Naturally, Dhruva too wanted to sit in his father’s lap. But Suruchi scolded him saying that he should not aspire to that which was Uttama’s. He should always remember that the throne was meant for Uttama and not for Dhruva.

Dhruva was  greatly  upset and angry. He went running to his mother and narrated to her what had happened. Suniti consoled him and told him that men suffer or prosper depending on what they had done in their past lives. If one has done good deeds in an earlier life, one becomes a king, has an umbrella held over one’s head and rides excellent horses and elephants in this life. Suruchi and Uttama must have performed many good deeds in their earlier lives. Whereas Suniti and Dhruva must have performed many evil deeds in their earlier lives. This was not something to be unhappy about. Wise men were satisfied with what they got. If Dhruva was really upset at what Suruchi had said, he should stop being unhappy and should instead spend his time on being good, religious, righteous and selfless.

Suniti’s words convinced Dhruva. He said, "Mother, your words have given me peace. I will try to achieve the highest position of all. True, the king loves Suruchi and true, I am not Suruchi’s son. But I am your son and I will show you what I can do. Let Uttama have his throne. I do not wish for something that is someone else’s. Through my own work I will achieve a place that not even my father has achieved."

Dhruva said this and went out of the house. There was a forest not very far away. And in the forest he met seven wise men. He bowed before them and said, "I am Dhruva,  son of Uttánapáda and Suniti. I am unhappy and so I have come here to seek solace and peace from you."

The sages were surprised. "Prince," they said, "You are very young. You have nothing to be unhappy about, you have nothing to worry about. Your father is a king and he is still alive. Nor do you seem to be ill. Why then are you unhappy?"

Dhruva told them the reason for his unhappiness. He said that he desired neither wealth nor kingdoms. He simply wanted to go to a place where no one had ever been before. The sages advised him to pray to Lord Vishnu. They also taught him the mantra that was to be used for praying to the Lord .

He prayed so painstackingly  that even the gods were disturbed. They did their best to break Dhruva’s tapasya( penance) but he was undisturbed. He thought only of Lord Vishnu. And saw nothing but God in Vishnu.

Pleased with his prayers ,Vishnu appeared before Dhruva and offered him a boon. Dhruva only wanted to attain the  highest place  to be at the  top of the entire world.  Lord  Vishnu ordained to place him in the centre of the Heavens so that all the stars would revolve around him. His mother Suniti would also be placed in the sky near him. (adapted from Vishnu Purana.tr. Wilson, Bk I,ch.8-11)

Symbolism
Uttánapáda,though a king,symbolises someone with his feet in the sky i.e. topsy-turvy- the ‘milky way galaxy’ which hangs over us and gives us a feeling that the sky is looking towards us with its head down and feet fixed upwards.
Suniti and Suruchi have opposite roles. Suruchi,the younger and beautiful wife stands for bright day whereas Suniti,the elder wife represents the dark side i.e night sky.Dhruva means polestar which is fixed and standing alone and aloof in the vast sky, with no friends or companions. Uttama can be younger shining star inexperienced and a novice as yet and can not be in a position to feel zealous of Dhruva.
 Saptarishis are always in attendance on him and revolve around him with all the respect and honour for him. Symbolically.he got the reward from the Creator for his penances by remaining at a fixed place all the time ,in all seasons,every night,in the farthest north.
 Located almost directly overhead as seen from the North Pole,  it has always been an important star to sailors, caravans  and travelers , winding their way over the oceans and desert by night and others who navigated their way by the stars. It moves but only very little distance taking 25000 years to complete one a revolution around the North Pole .
So the pole star,which all of us love , tinkles brightly in the night sky. He is the little prince Dhruva talked about above and is popularly known as Dhruvtara in India. It is not visible in the southern hemisphere.
  Have you seen Dhruva in the sky? Of course you have. Near the seven sages who form the constellation of the Great Bear.  The saptarishis provide a shield to the little prince and revolve around him completing one revolution in a day   
By: O P Gupta




LOVE TRIUMPHS DEATH


LEGEND OF A PRINCESS WHO DEFIED GOD OF DEATH

      8            THE IMMORTAL LOVE STORY OF SAVITRI AND SATYAVAN

This story is taken from India’s great epic Mahabharata. During the wanderings of Pandava brothers in their exile period of thirteen years a number of great sages frequently visited the brothers and narrated real life stories to them  to  share their moment of suffering so as to lighten the miseries of their exile.

The famous story of Savitri, her victory over the  God of Death, Yama, having much more complexity and philosophical depth is well known. It has been a source of great inspiration for the Hindu women since ages.   On the one hand what is real in life and what is illusion, and on the other the character of a woman who acknowledges the authority of her own mind above others (even a male deity) are just two of the important philosophical points of this moving tale (Mbh.,III.291).
Asvapati was  an ancient ruler of the Madra state in the north western region of the country. His daughter Savitri,  the famous princess of Madra,   was in passionate love  with  the famous Salwa prince Satyavan.  The story in brief is stated as under;-

“Savitri was the beautiful daughter of Asvapati, a wise and powerful king  of the Madra dynasty. The fame of Savitri's beauty spread far and wide, but she refused to marry, saying that she would herself go out in the world and find a husband for herself. So the king chose the best warriors to protect her, and the princess wandered throughout the country searching for a prince of her choice. These ancient Indian princesses were very independent and chose their own princely suitors in their own way.
One day she reached a dense forest, where dwelt a king , Dyumatsena, who had lost his kingdom and fallen into his bad days. Old and blind, he lived in a small hut with his wife and son. The son, who was a handsome young prince, was the sole comfort of his parents. He chopped wood and sold it in the countryside, and bought food for his parents, and they lived in love and happiness. Savitri was strongly drawn towards them, and she knew her search had come to an end. Savitri fell in love with the young prince, who was called Satyavan and was known for his legendary generosity.
 Hearing that Savitri has chosen a penniless prince, her father was heavily downcast. But Savitri was hell-bent on marrying Satyavan.The king consented, but a sage Narada , who happened to be then present there, informed him that the young prince was under the shadow of a fatal curse: he was doomed to die within a year. The king told her daughter about the curse and asked her to choose someone else. But Savitri refused, and stood firm in her determination to marry the same prince. So strong was the single-minded love and determination of Savitri that she chose a noble young man for her husband, knowing that he had only a year to live, married him with all confidence. The king finally agreed with a heavy heart.
The wedding of Savitri and Satyavan took place with a lot of fanfare, and the couple went back to the forest hut. For a whole year they lived happily. On the last day of the year, Savitri rose early, and when Satyavan picked up his axe to go into the forest to chop wood she requested him to take her along, and the two went into the jungle together.
Under a tall tree, he made a seat of soft green leaves and plucked flowers for her to weave into a garland while he chopped wood. Towards noon Satyavan felt a little tired, and after a while he came and lay down resting his head in Savitri's lap. Suddenly the whole forest grew dark, and soon Savitri saw a tall figure standing before her. It was Yama, the God of Death. "I have come to take your husband," said Yama, and looked down at Satyavan, as his soul left his body. “Daughter give up this dead body,  know, death is the fate of mortals,  everyone has had to die. Death is the fate of man.”  
When Yama was about to leave, Savitri ran after him, and pleaded with  him to take her too along with him to the land of the dead or give back the life of Satyavan. Yama replied, "Your time has not yet come, child. Go back to your home. The Lord of Death is so moved by her demeanour and speeches that he grants Savitri several boons. She may ask anything of him except the life of her husband. After promising various wishes for the well-being of her family Death grants her one last boon which he will not refuse. She asks for Life in all its fullness.
 Yama ,the Lord of Death is surprised: is she not alive already? She challenges him by asking if he is true to his word or not. His admiration for her is such that he grants her the boon unequivocally. Then, she turns the tables: life "in all its fullness" for her is impossible without Satyavan. The sequence in which Savitri asks her boons reveals to us the depth of her character. Her first concern is towards the suffering of her father-in-law, and only later does she ask a boon for her own father.
What greater example can there be of complete surrender? Glory to Indian womanhood, shaped as it is by divine literature like the Ramayana and Mahabharata. Truly did Savitri demonstrate how a virtuous woman can exalt two families at the same time.
Yama concedes; he sees the power of her emotion and the strength of her argument. Satyavan's body came back to life. He slowly woke up from the stupor and the two gladly walked back to their hut. Even the God of Death had to relent and surrender before her love and devotion.”
Savitri and Satyavan live on in the everyday life of Indian society, instilling such values that enrich our lives. That is real immortality which eluded all others who sought it.
Their story was later mythologised by the bards and missionaries of Hindu religion.
The mystery shrouded in the resurrection story of  Satyavan after death has been examined by various medical authorities In the opinion of Dr Aggarwal the story typically describes the signs and symptoms of sudden cardiac death and states ; 

Her fight with the Yama and bringing back the life of her husband by all means was some sort of cardio pulmonary resuscitation attempted by her on his dead body.The take home message is that we all should become Savitri and learn chest compression cardiac resuscitation to save some one’s life. You never know if you teach someone he may be the one saving your life when you need someone to resuscitate. (Dr K K Aggarwal is Padmashri and Dr B C Roy National Awardee, President Heart Care Foundation of India)

The moral of the story is that one can beat all odds in life through true love and devotion. So strong was the single-minded love and determination of Savitri that she chose a noble young man for her husband, knowing that he had only a year to live. She married him with all confidence. Even the God of Death had to relent, and bowed to her love and devotion.(Adapted From About.com: Hinduism And Wikipedia)
(The story of Savitri occurs in the Mahabharata in the Book of Forests (Vana Parva), chapters 293-299)



Sunday, 17 May 2020

INDIA THAT IS BHARAT


INDIA THAT IS BHARAT

उत्तरं यत्समुद्रस्य हिमाद्रेश्चैव दक्षिणम् ।
वर्षं तद् भारतं नाम भारती यत्र संततिः ।।

WE PROUDLY LOVE OUR MOTHERLAND
INDIA  derives its name from Indus,(Sindhu in Sanskrit).Sindhu was called Hindu by Persians and thus all people living on the east of Sindhu were known as Hindus collectively. The Republic of India is officially known as Bharat in Hindi and Bharatam in Sanskrit after Bharata a great king of ancient India .Vishnu Puran defines the extent of our country as under; It is one of the oldest civilizations in the world
"The country (varṣam) that lies north of the ocean and south of the snowy mountains is called Bhāratam; there dwell the descendants of Bharata."-Vishnu Purana- 2.3.
Let us understand who this majestic king was and when he ruled our motherland

 Bharata son of  the famous king Dushyanta is considered as the founder of a new dynasty called the Bharata dynasty.The Bharatas  find mention in the Rig-veda,
( Mandala -3 ) attributed to the great seer Vishwamitra.

The Bharatas  are said to  have taken part in the Battle of the Ten Kings, where they  defeated their enemies. Thus they were  the victors in the early power-struggles between the various Aryan and non-Aryan tribes ( RV.- VII/8 ) and  conclusively established their supremacy.

Bharata succeeded his father Dushyanta as the valiant and mighty sovereign who   ruled  the country with great skill, and treated his subjects like a father treats his children. He was very expert and wise, and he showed his people by himself setting an example how to perform their duties according to their inbred qualities and activities. Protecting and leading the people of his kingdom King Bharata ruled with strength and compassion.

Young Bharata was an unconventional ruler. He ruled his empire more like a democracy giving control to his citizens. This could also be a necessity to rule a large territory which contained almost the whole of present day India. king Bharata's conquests are described to have stretched over all of modern India, from the sea to the Himalayas  and  present day Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal, as well as the ancient Gandhara region of Afghanistan.

He was renowned for his valour, courage and strategem. The story of his heroism and physical strength is described in the Mahabharata in the following words;-

“While only a child (living) in the forest, he achieved feats incapable of being achieved by others. Endued with great strength, he speedily deprived the very lions, white as snow and armed with teeth and claws, of all their prowess, and dragged them and bound them (at his pleasure). He used to check tigers also, that were fiercer and more ruthless (than lions), and bring them to subjection. Seizing other beasts of prey possessed of great might, and even huge elephants, dyed with red arsenic and spotted with other liquid minerals by their teeth and tusks, he used to bring them to subjection, causing their mouths to become dry, or obliging them to fly away ( Mbh VII-/68)”

He is supposed to have united all warring ancient clans (in the central Asia) under one banner either by friendships and accords or by  winning over  them in battles. Under his leadership  the country was united  and a vast empire was brought under a central rule.    India (Bharat) first became substantially united around 3000 BCE, by emperor Bharata -The country  was later named after him as Bharat.

King Bharata was very handsome, with thick curly hair on his head  and was very conscience of his personality and composure. His wife Sunanda ,the daughter of  Kasi king Sarvasena,  was respected and loved  by her subjects to whom she  was  fully devoted . They had no children as none  of the children born to them had survived. And thus king Bharata put a commoner , by the name of Vitatha , on the throne as his successor . He did so because he believed that a ruler should be brave and just so that he can defend his country and be just to his subjects. He gave little importance to the privileges that accrued from and by the virtue of birth. Karma (action) was more important for him than birth
.


Saturday, 9 August 2014



BEGINNING OF MONARCHY IN INDIA

IKSHVAKU -THE FOUNDER OF THE DYNASTY

The first historically important king of India was Ikshvaku  said to be a son of mythical Manu Vaivasvata. He is the founder and ancestor of Sun dynasty .  He is reported to have set up his colonies at a number of places and expanded the sphere of influence of the Aryan tribes by  struggles, conquests and colonization. The Ramayana   clearly describes Ikshvaku as the son of Manu.

Ikshvaku was undoutedly one of the earliest and most important Indo-Aryan monarchs of India, but he is speculated by some scholars (including Max Müller) as having been not a descendant of Manu but the chief of a tribe called Ikshvakus located on the upper reaches of river Indus. He also finds mention in the Rig-Veda (X.60.4.6), where he is described ‘as rich and dazzling’ and  his rule is stated to be glorious and full of splendour. The Aryan civilization was established and spread over the Sapta Sindhu  region by king Ikshvaku. He established the first stable monarchy after the Deluge, in the early Bronze age probably in the same period the Indus Valley Civilisation was taking shape.   The Ramayana supports this view when it says clearly that the first kingdom was established only after the Satya yuga though the Aryan tribes are said to be dominating the Sapta sindhu region for over  sixty centuries as the modern researches confirm

Ikshvaku established the rule of law - a law grounded in grace and justice - developed and heralded a golden age during which time Arya-vartha, the Aryan homeland, became a paradise on earth. He is considered one of the wisest, bravest and greatest kings ever. Ikshvaku was also a contemporary of Persian king Jamsheed and king Ukusi of Sumeria. He is said to have defeated the materialistic Panis,who were occupying Afghanistan .Panis later known as Phoenicians  were maritime people and business magnates who always quarrelled and fought with the Indian Aryans,  living on the banks of the Indus and that the latter knew them as Panis.

 Professor. L.A.Waddell ( 1854-1938 ) finds Ikshvaku to be identical with  king Ukusi, the  first Sumerian king of the first Sumerian dynasty of Kish Chronicle, and with king Agushe and dates his period from 3378 BCE to 3349 BCE . Egyptian king Menes also seems to be  ruling at the same time.   Modern consensus dates the era of Menes or the start of the first dynasty between c. 3100–3050 BCE.  Dr.Beneditti, an eminent Italian scholar places  the accession of Ikshvaku in 3197 BCE.

It thus suggests, on the basis of the  comparative study of the ancient civilizations from Egypt to China, that the parameters of  the  recordable historic events of all these nations  were evolved almost at the same time sometimes in the 4th  millennium BCE and not earlier. Thus there is no reason to doubt the historicity of Ikshvaku and the establishment of Aryan monarchy in India,sometimes in the period 3300 –3100 BCE., on the basis of available evidence ,literary and archaeological.  . 

Col. James Tod is also of the opinion that the monarchies of Egypt, China and Assyria were established later to the Aryan kingdoms of Sun and Moon .

His kingdom, most probably, lay in the Upper Indus Valley, on both sides of the river Indus or it may be that he was having a colony to the west of the Indus too, guarded by high mountains in the region of  north –west. 



Wednesday, 2 July 2014

KING HARISHCHANDRA OF SOLAR DYNASTY


KING HARISHCHANDRA OF SOLAR DYNASTY

King Harishchandra was the most loveble son of Trishanku, and the 34th king of the Solar dynasty.
His legend is very popular and often told as a benchmark for an ideal life. He was renowned for his piety and justice. His name in Sanskrit means "having golden splendour". He had two unique qualities - the first being, he kept his word and never went back on what he uttered as a promise; the other being, he never uttered a lie in his life. These twin qualities were tested heavily in his lifetime by various circumstances that led him to penury and separation from his family. But he stood by his principles in the face of all ordeals and persevered to become a symbol of courage.
Though reduced to a state of utter helplessness by the sage Vishwamitra – as the Puranic story goes - Harishchandra never lost his humility, faith or his honour.  Later Vishwamitra  narrated the origin and the consequence of the feud between Vasishta and himself which were the cause of the sufferings of Harishchandra and his family and thus called it all an illusory drama.  It seems the powerful  and arrogant clergy in collusion with inimical forces  dislodged the noble king and he had  to spend some youthful years in exile in the neighbouring Varanasi but he regained his throne with strong public support after defeating the designs of his rivals. His capital lay between Ayodhya and Varanasi, probably on the banks of river Gomti.Many mythical episodes  were later coined  casting aspertions on his truthfulness by zealous rivals of no significance.
 This simple historic fact was later mythologised and the name of venerable sage Vishwamitra was dragged in the story only to vilify him. An attempt was made earlier  also by the insurgents with a great military force during the reign of Asitbahu – about eight generations earlier
 King Harishchandra stands as a beacon of truth amongst  all the illustrious and renowned kings of India. He, as already stated, stood steadfast in his determination to do his duty in the face of severe obstacles, impediments and difficulties that would have deterred any other ordinary mortal.
He was a very just and caring king, loved by all his subjects. There was no want in his kingdom and people lived in comfort and happiness.  Ancient records reveal that  he had  performed a Rajasuya  yajña  and  was acknowledged as an emperor. Harishchandra's character is indelibly etched in the minds of the Indians and his story is of perennial interest. It will last for as long as the value of truth lasts. It illumines our life. It was this story which helped Prince Yudhishtra to get over his adversities. It  occurs in the Mahabharata and also in the Puranas, and has been repeatedly immortalized  in poetry, cinema and in drama. It took its origin in the early literature, flowed through the Puranas, ran into cascades of poetry, and has continued to enrich the life of our people. He was succeeded by his son Rohita or Rohitashwa.
Harishchandra lived the life of truthfulness and soon became renowned as “Satyavrata” – an observer of truth.